Shaded = the better side of each row. Rows with no clear “better” (plays, drives, attempts, penalties, possession) aren’t shaded. Efficiency, What it cost them and Early vs late downs use the nflfastR/rbsdm play filter, so a team’s EPA/play here can differ from its season figure on the team pages; Team stats follows the official box-score conventions instead.
CHIEfficiencyATL
| +0.01(76) | EPA / play(plays) | −0.22(55) |
| +0.18(45) | ↳ Passing | −0.22(44) |
| −0.24(31) | ↳ Rushing | −0.25(11) |
| 49% | Success rate | 35% |
| 53% | ↳ Passing | 34% |
| 42% | ↳ Rushing | 36% |
| 26% | 1st down rate | 22% |
| 29% | ↳ Passing | 25% |
| 23% | ↳ Rushing | 9% |
| 5(7%) | Explosive plays(rate) | 6(11%) |
| 3(7%) | ↳ Passing(20+ yd completion) | 4(9%) |
| 2(6%) | ↳ Rushing(10+ yd run) | 2(18%) |
| 0(TO +1, expl −1) | Toxic differential(turnovers + explosives) | 0(TO −1, expl +1) |
CHITeam statsATL
| 20 | 1st downs | 13 |
| 12 | ↳ Passing 1st downs | 9 |
| 7 | ↳ Rushing 1st downs | 1 |
| 1 | ↳ 1st downs from penalties | 3 |
| 9-17 | ↳ 3rd down efficiency | 3-12 |
| 0-0 | ↳ 4th down efficiency | 0-3 |
| 73 | Total plays | 50 |
| 368 | Total yards | 257 |
| 14 | Total drives | 12 |
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 5.1 |
| 270 | Passing | 194 |
| 30/36 | ↳ Comp/Att | 19/33 |
| 6.8 | ↳ Yards per pass | 5.1 |
| 0 | ↳ Interceptions thrown | 0 |
| 4-35 | ↳ Sacks-yards lost | 5-31 |
| 98 | Rushing | 63 |
| 33 | ↳ Rushing attempts | 12 |
| 3.0 | ↳ Yards per rush | 5.3 |
| 4-5 | Red zone(made-att) | 3-3 |
| 12-133 | Penalties | 4-31 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 1 | ↳ Fumbles lost | 2 |
| 0 | ↳ Interceptions thrown | 0 |
| 0 | Defensive / special teams TDs | 0 |
| 40:08 | Possession | 19:52 |
Why the play counts differ. Efficiency counts every run and dropback the way nflfastR and rbsdm.com do, including sacks, scrambles, plays wiped out by penalties and 2-point tries, so CHI has 76 plays there and 73 in the official total above. Rushing attempts count kneel-downs and QB scrambles, while rush plays are the designed runs in that efficiency set, which is why CHI shows 33 attempts and 31 rush plays.
CHIWhat it cost themATL
| −5.6 | EPA lost to turnovers | −8.5 |
| −5.6 | EPA lost to sacks | −10.3 |
| −12.7 | EPA lost to penalties | −3.3 |
A strip-sack counts in both the sack row and the turnover row.
CHIEarly vs late downsATL
| −0.11(57) | Early downs(1st–2nd) EPA / play | +0.03(37) |
| 46% | ↳ Success rate | 35% |
| +0.37(19) | Late downs(3rd–4th) EPA / play | −0.97(16) |
| 58% | ↳ Success rate | 25% |
Passing
| Player | C/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | RTG | EPA/DB | CPOE | SUCC% | aDOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | ||||||||||
| Caleb Williams | 30/36 | 305 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 111.2 | +0.25 | +15.3 | 56% | 3.9 |
| ATL | ||||||||||
| Michael Penix Jr. | 19/33 | 225 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 108.8 | −0.32 | −7.3 | 28% | 9.8 |
Rushing
| Player | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | EPA/CAR | SUCC% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | ||||||
| Roschon JohnsonRB | 13 | 51 | 1 | 3.9 | −0.25 | 54% |
| D'Andre SwiftRB | 16 | 44 | 2 | 2.8 | −0.13 | 38% |
| Caleb WilliamsQB | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1.3 | −0.88 | 0% |
| ATL | ||||||
| Bijan RobinsonRB | 9 | 61 | 0 | 6.8 | −0.05 | 44% |
| Brian RobinsonRB | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | −1.14 | 0% |
| Michael Penix Jr.QB | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | −0.72 | 0% |
Receiving
| Player | TGT | REC | YDS | TD | TGT% | YAC | EPA/TGT | CATCH% | aDOT | Y/TGT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI · 33 team targets | ||||||||||
| Luther Burden IIIWR | 8 | 8 | 95 | 0 | 24.2% | 49 | +0.39 | 100% | 5.8 | 11.9 |
| Colston LovelandTE | 7 | 6 | 65 | 1 | 21.2% | 34 | +0.63 | 86% | 4.7 | 9.3 |
| Rome OdunzeWR | 4 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 12.1% | 12 | +1.66 | 75% | 9.5 | 9.8 |
| D'Andre SwiftRB | 5 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 15.2% | 32 | +0.12 | 80% | 0.2 | 5.2 |
| Zavion ThomasWR | 3 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 9.1% | 22 | +0.59 | 100% | 1.0 | 8.3 |
| Roschon JohnsonRB | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 6.1% | 16 | +1.21 | 100% | 3.0 | 11.0 |
| Kalif RaymondWR | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 6.1% | 21 | +0.08 | 100% | −1.5 | 9.0 |
| Cole KmetTE | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6.1% | 7 | −0.13 | 100% | −2.0 | 1.5 |
| ATL · 33 team targets | ||||||||||
| Jahan DotsonWR | 5 | 3 | 87 | 1 | 15.2% | 21 | +1.31 | 60% | 17.4 | 17.4 |
| Drake LondonWR | 10 | 4 | 62 | 0 | 30.3% | 33 | −0.33 | 40% | 14.3 | 6.2 |
| Kyle PittsTE | 7 | 5 | 60 | 2 | 21.2% | 35 | +0.88 | 71% | 5.6 | 8.6 |
| Brian RobinsonRB | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 6.1% | 0 | −0.20 | 100% | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Zachariah BranchWR | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 6.1% | 0 | −1.36 | 100% | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Austin HooperTE | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3.0% | 1 | +0.12 | 100% | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Olamide ZaccheausWR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.1% | 0 | −1.32 | 0% | 11.0 | 0.0 |
| Bijan RobinsonRB | 2 | 2 | −8 | 0 | 6.1% | 3 | −1.36 | 100% | −5.5 | −4.0 |
Player lines won’t always add up to team totals. TGT% is a share of the team targets above — the throws charged to a receiver — not of the pass attempts in Team stats, so the two counts can differ. 12 of Caleb Williams’s 305 passing yards aren’t credited to a receiver above (yards after a lateral, or a catch by a lineman or quarterback), and runs by receivers and kneel-downs don’t appear in the rushing table.